Re: Indica vs. Sativa -- Which buzz do most people prefer?

[Charlie Wilkes]

On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:37:50 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
<charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:

>I have two distinct varieties of cannabis at the moment:
>
>1. Pure indica budded under 100% HPS. It is that dense, dusty choker
>pot in which a gram or so of blond hash ends up in the bottom of a 1
>oz. bag after it has been handled a bit. One toke from a pipe will
>lock a newbie to the couch for a solid hour.
>
>2. Ordinary Mexican sativa budded under mercury vapor and some HPS,
>blackish-green with an almost citrus taste and a zingy high that can
>make you want to clean the house.
>
>The Mex isn't even close to the same potency as the indica, but if you
>bracket the dose, you can get equally stoned from either. Assuming
>comparable dosing and discounting the "convenience" factor of only
>smoking a little vs. several big tokes, which high do you prefer?
>
>Charlie

[jg]

Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote in message
news:h8r8iv8s3pet1idbo1fe4p9vqqgb36mm7m@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:37:50 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
> <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
>
> >I have two distinct varieties of cannabis at the moment:
> >
> >1. Pure indica budded under 100% HPS. It is that dense, dusty choker
> >pot in which a gram or so of blond hash ends up in the bottom of a 1
> >oz. bag after it has been handled a bit. One toke from a pipe will
> >lock a newbie to the couch for a solid hour.
> >
> >2. Ordinary Mexican sativa budded under mercury vapor and some HPS,
> >blackish-green with an almost citrus taste and a zingy high that can
> >make you want to clean the house.
> >
> >The Mex isn't even close to the same potency as the indica, but if you
> >bracket the dose, you can get equally stoned from either. Assuming
> >comparable dosing and discounting the "convenience" factor of only
> >smoking a little vs. several big tokes, which high do you prefer?
> >
actually I get the best kick out of watching f*kwits like you wipe
themselves out.

[Charlie Wilkes]

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:14:55 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
<charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:37:50 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
><charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
>
>>I have two distinct varieties of cannabis at the moment:
>>
>>1. Pure indica budded under 100% HPS. It is that dense, dusty choker
>>pot in which a gram or so of blond hash ends up in the bottom of a 1
>>oz. bag after it has been handled a bit. One toke from a pipe will
>>lock a newbie to the couch for a solid hour.
>>
>>2. Ordinary Mexican sativa budded under mercury vapor and some HPS,
>>blackish-green with an almost citrus taste and a zingy high that can
>>make you want to clean the house.
>>
>>The Mex isn't even close to the same potency as the indica, but if you
>>bracket the dose, you can get equally stoned from either. Assuming
>>comparable dosing and discounting the "convenience" factor of only
>>smoking a little vs. several big tokes, which high do you prefer?
>>
>>Charlie

[jg]

Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote in message
news:5hndivs5r0capgvhl3dnoc7h2j8b82c7t2@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:14:55 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
> <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:37:50 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
> ><charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I have two distinct varieties of cannabis at the moment:
> >>
> >>1. Pure indica budded under 100% HPS. It is that dense, dusty choker
> >>pot in which a gram or so of blond hash ends up in the bottom of a 1
> >>oz. bag after it has been handled a bit. One toke from a pipe will
> >>lock a newbie to the couch for a solid hour.
> >>
> >>2. Ordinary Mexican sativa budded under mercury vapor and some HPS,
> >>blackish-green with an almost citrus taste and a zingy high that can
> >>make you want to clean the house.
> >>
> >>The Mex isn't even close to the same potency as the indica, but if you
> >>bracket the dose, you can get equally stoned from either. Assuming
> >>comparable dosing and discounting the "convenience" factor of only
> >>smoking a little vs. several big tokes, which high do you prefer?
> >>

What, hit a wrong key there Charlie or did your brain think it had something
to say but the hemp got the better of it?

[herb_al]

hemp


--
herb_al
------------------------------------------------------------------------
herb_al's Profile: http://www.cannabisworld.org/vbportal/forums/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=11315
View this thread: http://www.cannabisworld.org/vbportal/forums/showthread.php?threadid=50474

[herb_al]

The ignorance of man is once again shown by the desire to express
feelings on a subject when he or she has no fucking idea what theyre
talking about.


--
herb_al
------------------------------------------------------------------------
herb_al's Profile: http://www.cannabisworld.org/vbportal/forums/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=11315
View this thread: http://www.cannabisworld.org/vbportal/forums/showthread.php?threadid=50474

[Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam]

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:59:22 -0400, something compelled herb_al
<herb_al.rcrya@anon.cannabisworld.org>, to say:

>
>The ignorance of man is once again shown by the desire to express
>feelings on a subject when he or she has no fucking idea what theyre
>talking about.

The ignorance of man is once again shown by the desire to express
feeling on a subject about which he has no fucking idea.

HTH.

[SMITH29]

user@domain.invalid wrote:
> Charlie Wilkes said the following on 30/07/2003 4:42 AM:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:14:55 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
>> <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:37:50 GMT, Charlie Wilkes
>>> <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have two distinct varieties of cannabis at the moment:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Pure indica budded under 100% HPS. It is that dense, dusty choker
>>>> pot in which a gram or so of blond hash ends up in the bottom of a 1
>>>> oz. bag after it has been handled a bit. One toke from a pipe will
>>>> lock a newbie to the couch for a solid hour.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Ordinary Mexican sativa budded under mercury vapor and some HPS,
>>>> blackish-green with an almost citrus taste and a zingy high that can
>>>> make you want to clean the house.
>>>>
>>>> The Mex isn't even close to the same potency as the indica, but if you
>>>> bracket the dose, you can get equally stoned from either. Assuming
>>>> comparable dosing and discounting the "convenience" factor of only
>>>> smoking a little vs. several big tokes, which high do you prefer?
>>>>
>>>> Charlie
>
>
> The wa in wa.general stands for Western Australia.
xxxx
You assies need to change your gaggle or flock to w.a.general or w.a-general to have the privacy you desire.
Now get with it and quit slobbering all over us....
The29

[jg]

SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iBLWa.47524$YN5.37895@sccrnsc01...
> user@domain.invalid wrote:
.....................
> >
> >
> > The wa in wa.general stands for Western Australia.
> xxxx
> You assies need to change your gaggle or flock to w.a.general or
w.a-general to have the privacy you desire.
> Now get with it and quit slobbering all over us....
> The29
>
Since it would not make sense to use Q.L.D. for Queensland or V.I.C. for
Victoria, W.A. would not suggest itself as a state of Australia in company
with NT, QLD, NSW, VIC, TAS, ACT, SA would it? w.a- seems to be a variation
nobody would find logical.... except perhaps someone who calls a city by the
same name as a state and thinks when paths cross its the others who are
wrong.

[SMITH29]

jg wrote:

> SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:iBLWa.47524$YN5.37895@sccrnsc01...
>
>>user@domain.invalid wrote:
>
> ....................
>
>>>
>>>The wa in wa.general stands for Western Australia.
>>
>>xxxx
>>You assies need to change your gaggle or flock to w.a.general or
>
> w.a-general to have the privacy you desire.
>
>> Now get with it and quit slobbering all over us....
>>The29
>>
>
> Since it would not make sense to use Q.L.D. for Queensland or V.I.C. for
> Victoria, W.A. would not suggest itself as a state of Australia in company
> with NT, QLD, NSW, VIC, TAS, ACT, SA would it? w.a- seems to be a variation
> nobody would find logical.... except perhaps someone who calls a city by the
> same name as a state and thinks when paths cross its the others who are
> wrong.
>
>
xxxx
Nice double talk but wa is washington and w.a. or w-a would better define something NOT washington, eh!
Up her in the states wa is the abreviation for the word Washington as in Washington State
and not Washington D. C...
Confusing ? I don't think so. You guys need to change your group lettering arrangement to avoid conflict which will come up untill you blokes get tired of it and ignore or change.
Thank You Very Much,
Have a nice day.
The29

[Tie Dyed Troll]

>
> xxxx
> Nice double talk but wa is washington and w.a. or w-a would better define
> something NOT washington, eh!
> Up her in the states wa is the abreviation for the word Washington as in
> Washington State
> and not Washington D. C...
> Confusing ? I don't think so. You guys need to change your group lettering
> arrangement to avoid conflict which will come up untill you blokes get tired
> of it and ignore or change.
> Thank You Very Much,
> Have a nice day.
> The29
>
were you born this much of a dick or did you have to study?